Comments on: Adopted son discovers Charles Manson to be his biological father

By: Michelle

Michelle — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:32:12 +0000

It is rape when the victim is rendered helpless, hence the drugs and alcohol. It’s written in the law.

By: wildwizard

wildwizard — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:24:11 +0000

…ummm if there was an orgy in the 60s that led to this man’s conception then any one with a set of testicles that was present at the previously mentioned orgy could have been his genetic father.

If you consider that it was the 60’s then likely any male his genetic mother came into contact with could have been his biological male parent.

The facts he writes music & poetry have nothing to do with his father at all, the fact he has mental heath issues may not either considering his biological mother admits to abusing drugs during his conception-she may even have been abusing them the entire time of her pregnancy.

You know before he meets his daddy he may want a paternity test done to find out who the man really is doesn’t Maury Povich still do them for ya if you put your a** up on the stage on the freak show that bares his name.

By: amish

amish — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:09:09 +0000

This guy appears to be selling a book and a band; this sounds like publicity bs to me.

By: US Citizen

US Citizen — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:42:31 +0000

I think Matthew Roberts has the makings of being an absolutely wonderful son to his birth mother. He should focus on that–and transform his sadness into gratitude to his mother for having the courage to give him life, and having the courage to give him good parents. He was lucky she did both. She knew he deserved love and he got it. He should focus on the fact that he deserves love, is able to multiply that love by giving it back to others, and be the wonderful man his biological father never was. In other words, he should just be himself and feel wonderful and smile about it. He is here in part to help heal his birth mother. No need to be ashamed of his father–he is not his father–he is an entirely different spirit given a powerful life experience that is his to create from in amazing ways. When I saw his face, I could only smile with compassion, for compassion reflects back from his photo.

By: Sachiel Rising

Sachiel Rising — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:54:21 +0000

When I first caught sight of his pic in the article, I thought he resembled Tom Savini… who \m/_ROCKS_\m/ btw.

By: keltoall

keltoall — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:03:24 +0000

Frank, his birth date is March 22, 1968. There’s the math. His website is here: newrisingson.com

By: Sean

Sean — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:35:56 +0000

@ Frank
Um… If he was born October 25, 1968, wouldn’t that mean he turned 41 on October 25, 2009. So, basically, he could have been conceived almost anytime in 1967 and he would be 41 now.

By: Anon

Anon — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:26:46 +0000

If this were me, I’d want DNA testing done for freaking proof. Wouldn’t be the first time a woman has either been mistaken or has outright lied (for whatever reason) about who fathered her child. If it is true, it’s beyond a major bummer, but none of us can help who our parents are.